Asalam wa Alaikom ,
As we all know the adhan/azan does not call here in glasgow :( and personally i find it hard to find some reliable prayer times , i think that Glasgow Central Mosque should have an all year round Salat time table posted here on the site .Insha'Allah you will consider my suggesion , and if such a timetable for glasgow already exists i would appreciate being told !
thank you , Wa alaikom asalam .
Sarah Ahmed Mahmoud , 17 , Glasgow .
Posted in
Submitted by SarahMahmoud on 28 October 2007 - 11:21pm.
admin | 30 October 2007 - 11:28am
Walaikumussalam
We'll look into this. In the meantime, please use www.alfurqanmosque.com to see Glasgow's prayer times.
- reply
»zainsehgal | 19 November 2007 - 12:21pm
The new prayer time table has been added to this website, it is showing on the main home page (www.centralmosque.co.uk) on the right hand side of the webpage.
- reply
»admin | 19 November 2007 - 4:06pm
The full timetable is now also available in the menu. I hope no-one
timed how long that took :-) Well, actually I had to take the whole
year's prayer times and format them so they can be inserted into the
database. Macros to the rescue here. The PHP code didn't take too long
either - it's just a mod of the Jamaah Time code.
- reply
»SarahMahmoud | 30 November 2007 - 6:18pm
Asalam wa alikom ,
jazak allahu khayran ,
i am very happy to see the timetable on the website
thank you .
wa alikom salam .
Sarah Ahmed Mahmoud , 17 , glasgow
- reply
»admin | 6 May 2008 - 1:49pm
The eagle-eyed amongst you (thanks Maulana Omair) will have noticed that the prayer/salah times were out by one day (i.e. a couple of minutes) recently.
This is because although the prayer times are stored in a database, we want to ignore the "year" part of it, otherwise we'd have to update the database every year. 2008 was a leap year, so using the day of the year to convert the database date to the real date meant that any day of the year after March 1st in the database was actually one day later in reality, i.e. May 5th was the 126th day of the year, not the 125th.
Make sense? Probably not! :-)
- reply
»Post new comment